Comments on: A GovWeb group blog? http://davepress.net/2008/07/15/a-govweb-group-blog/ Using the internet to make government more interesting Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:06:57 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Creating an email newsletter | DavePress http://davepress.net/2008/07/15/a-govweb-group-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1417 Creating an email newsletter | DavePress Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:30:10 +0000 http://davepress.net/?p=500#comment-1417 [...] full of social web news, views and other tidbits. It might go some way to filling the need for the govweb group blog I mooted earlier, though I should imagine it would be written in sufficiently broad terms to make [...] [...] full of social web news, views and other tidbits. It might go some way to filling the need for the govweb group blog I mooted earlier, though I should imagine it would be written in sufficiently broad terms to make [...]

]]>
By: Carl Haggerty http://davepress.net/2008/07/15/a-govweb-group-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1249 Carl Haggerty Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:02:51 +0000 http://davepress.net/?p=500#comment-1249 This does sound like a positive idea and an opportunity to consolidate, what feels like a sea of information. How it is managed will be key and how you draw in contributions from people who have great things to say but are not online. Shout if you need help, i'm happy to support where i can.. This does sound like a positive idea and an opportunity to consolidate, what feels like a sea of information.

How it is managed will be key and how you draw in contributions from people who have great things to say but are not online.

Shout if you need help, i’m happy to support where i can..

]]>
By: Dave http://davepress.net/2008/07/15/a-govweb-group-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1218 Dave Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:15:21 +0000 http://davepress.net/?p=500#comment-1218 Thanks for the broadly positive comments - I think the issue around workload is a valid one, and it might be worth making it a once a week affair. Also, it doesn't have to be fresh content all the time - it could be things previously published elsewhere which the target audience (ie not generally web 2.0 (or indeed 1.0) savvy folk) are unlikely to have seen. Thanks for the broadly positive comments – I think the issue around workload is a valid one, and it might be worth making it a once a week affair. Also, it doesn’t have to be fresh content all the time – it could be things previously published elsewhere which the target audience (ie not generally web 2.0 (or indeed 1.0) savvy folk) are unlikely to have seen.

]]>
By: Jeremy Gould http://davepress.net/2008/07/15/a-govweb-group-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1217 Jeremy Gould Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:20:06 +0000 http://davepress.net/?p=500#comment-1217 Sounds like a good idea, as long as it doesn't get too complicated or onerous. Sounds like a good idea, as long as it doesn’t get too complicated or onerous.

]]>
By: paul canning http://davepress.net/2008/07/15/a-govweb-group-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1216 paul canning Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:32:16 +0000 http://davepress.net/?p=500#comment-1216 I've commented about this before - It's one reason I rave about the Victorian egov initiative, it's an edited feed (which I very occasionally make!). To make it sustainable though I've pointed at PSF, who kindof do it in their email newsletter, as do some other egov news sources, though in a far too limited way. I do like the idea of the raw alongside the edited though. But who supports/funds the editor(s)? I’ve commented about this before – It’s one reason I rave about the Victorian egov initiative, it’s an edited feed (which I very occasionally make!).

To make it sustainable though I’ve pointed at PSF, who kindof do it in their email newsletter, as do some other egov news sources, though in a far too limited way.

I do like the idea of the raw alongside the edited though. But who supports/funds the editor(s)?

]]>
By: Steph http://davepress.net/2008/07/15/a-govweb-group-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1208 Steph Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:52:33 +0000 http://davepress.net/?p=500#comment-1208 I vote yes. It's not exactly a fashionable idea and I suspect it's a bit of work, but something slightly more edited could be really powerful as a way of moving us forward as a community, in the same way that A List Apart (http://www.alistapart.com) did for the web design community. I vote yes.

It’s not exactly a fashionable idea and I suspect it’s a bit of work, but something slightly more edited could be really powerful as a way of moving us forward as a community, in the same way that A List Apart (http://www.alistapart.com) did for the web design community.

]]>