<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social reporting for Digital Engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davepress.net/2009/04/26/social-reporting-for-digital-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davepress.net/2009/04/26/social-reporting-for-digital-engagement/</link>
	<description>Open government and everything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:54:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://davepress.net/2009/04/26/social-reporting-for-digital-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-3014</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davepress.net/?p=1496#comment-3014</guid>
		<description>Another event, another inaccessible web service, this time from Ning.  It&#039;s particularly frustrating that you&#039;re using a digitally-divisive tool for a digital &lt;em&gt;inclusion&lt;/em&gt; event.

Is there anything - anything at all - that I can do to persuade you to use accessible and open tools for your social reporting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another event, another inaccessible web service, this time from Ning.  It&#8217;s particularly frustrating that you&#8217;re using a digitally-divisive tool for a digital <em>inclusion</em> event.</p>
<p>Is there anything &#8211; anything at all &#8211; that I can do to persuade you to use accessible and open tools for your social reporting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

