<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seariki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davepress.net/2008/01/03/seariki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davepress.net/2008/01/03/seariki/</link>
	<description>Digital Enabler</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://davepress.net/2008/01/03/seariki/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 09:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davepress.net/2008/01/03/seariki/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Yes it is, as far as I am aware. You can do pretty much what you like with it as it is published under the GDL. The potential revenue for Wikipedia if it allowed ads on the site is gigantic (Jason Calacanis is constantly banging on about it) but Jimmy Wales wants to keep the site completely free of adverts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is, as far as I am aware. You can do pretty much what you like with it as it is published under the GDL. The potential revenue for Wikipedia if it allowed ads on the site is gigantic (Jason Calacanis is constantly banging on about it) but Jimmy Wales wants to keep the site completely free of adverts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: See-ming Lee</title>
		<link>http://davepress.net/2008/01/03/seariki/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>See-ming Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davepress.net/2008/01/03/seariki/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Are you suggesting that it is legal to monetise Wikipedia content? That is interesting then--because according to the AdAge Annual 2008, Wikipedia has more reader base than NYTimes. See: &lt;a href="blog.seeminglee.com/2008/01/wikipedia-more-audience-than-new-york.html" title="Wikipedia, more audience than the New York Times" rel="nofollow"&gt;my blog post&lt;/a&gt;.

Cheers,
See-ming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you suggesting that it is legal to monetise Wikipedia content? That is interesting then&#8211;because according to the AdAge Annual 2008, Wikipedia has more reader base than NYTimes. See: <a href="blog.seeminglee.com/2008/01/wikipedia-more-audience-than-new-york.html" title="Wikipedia, more audience than the New York Times" rel="nofollow">my blog post</a>.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
See-ming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
